data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b515/7b515af39634122036aa38883b4c89127ed3c5fc" alt=""
The icing on the cake is certification issued by authorities verifying the figures claimed by the manufacturer. It is but natural, that a layman would trust the words of manufacturer by considering the claimed mileage figures as duly affirmed by the authorities. I am not saying that those figures are false or it is not mentioned that they are achieved in controlled atmosphere, but my point is, why not authorities find out the actual fuel efficiency of the bike in different real life conditions rather than doing it in an unrealistic and controlled atmosphere.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7c31b/7c31b32c8eb9333c71d4a43b59613ff918065ece" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c5423/c54239bb5bbd23a8679dd33bff664e25703c2d16" alt=""
Now tell me, can anybody achieve this so called controlled condition in real life? or for that matter what is the need to do so? why would you want to do that? Someone of you might say that by doing things like that the manufactures can get the maximum limit of the engine pertaining to the fuel efficiency. But don't you think that it would be better if the manufacturers or the authorities try to find out the maximum fuel efficiency of the engine in more real life conditions to give us a fair idea about the efficiency we are going to get, rather than cut us loose to find out the tentative mileage from our motorbikes in real road conditions, which is for sure going to be lesser than by 30-35% from the fancy figures shown by the companies.
What do you think about it? Do share your opinion on this.
Picture Credit: pcsperformance.com
By: Farhan Kashif